From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GQ7n5-0002Pd-TC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:31:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8KJSnR5012179; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:28:49 GMT Received: from creativecommunications.com (creativecommunications.com [65.17.124.162]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8KJQYFj008378 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:26:34 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by creativecommunications.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAC844C02A for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:26:34 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at creativecommunications.com Received: from [192.168.1.145] (unknown [192.168.1.145]) by creativecommunications.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA8144C029 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:26:34 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <451195CF.8010000@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:26:07 -0500 From: Andrew Gaffney User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds References: <45103E6B.4020308@gentoo.org> <45116E9A.9040008@gentoo.org> <200609201306.00700.vapier@gentoo.org> <451184FB.6010209@gentoo.org> <45118E83.90108@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <45118E83.90108@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9fc0634e-a1f9-426a-af68-8bce5eafc58e X-Archives-Hash: 92eb1cbc2b88af9502c66b170731e072 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Andrew Gaffney wrote: >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 12:38, Alec Warner wrote: >>>> I think Chris's primary concern is one of "Tell us whats up before it >>>> happens." >>> why should he care ? some Gentoo guys take catalyst and produce >>> stage4s directed at certain applications >> He cares because they're basically extending the roll of releng without >> it being under releng's control. I know I'd be annoyed if they release a >> x86 stage4 and then *I* gets bugs, but I know absolutely nothing about >> it. Having 2 projects doing almost the same thing is just going to >> confuse users. > > As somebody's already mentioned, the embedded project releases GNAP and > has a releng liaison. There's no reason the seeds project couldn't also > have a releng liaison, which seems to resolve the main dispute here. That's not the issue. The issue is that there should *already* be a releng liason, but nobody from releng seems to know anything about this project. -- Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list