From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GQ2Jl-0001lV-Qf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:40:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8KDdJcV023749; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:39:20 GMT Received: from mail01.home.net.pl (mail01.home.net.pl [62.129.252.11]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8KDa7kD024863 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:36:07 GMT Received: from localhost (HELO ?10.0.0.108?) (krzysiek.pawlik.people@home@127.0.0.1) by mail01.home.net.pl with SMTP; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:36:04 -0000 Message-ID: <451143C7.6070709@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:36:07 +0200 From: Krzysiek Pawlik Organization: Gentoo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060917 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited References: <451127AB.4060202@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <451127AB.4060202@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6701ADF80F40504E260438FD" X-Archives-Salt: 3d786aa1-ef0f-4f82-bf27-d832cb5b824f X-Archives-Hash: 47d2dfa4ca6f3d90be80a3daa36222e2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6701ADF80F40504E260438FD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Simon Stelling wrote: > I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me. I like the idea with one exception: > Licenses that need to be explicitly accepted before installation of a p= ackage > (and only these) should be package.masked by default with a header like= > the following: >=20 > :: >=20 > # Simon Stelling # This license needs to be agreed on explicitly to be considered > # legally binding. > # By unmasking and installing the package you agree with its terms. > txt-licenses/wierd-license Why not make the ebuild ask for confirmation? Would work with versioned l= icenses (for example: txt-licenses/wierd-license-2.1 and txt-licenses/wierd-license-2.999 - both would require ACK). Breaks portag= e in a way it's interactive, but it's already happening in few ebuilds (eutils.eclass::check_license()). --=20 Krzysiek Pawlik key id: 0xBC555551 desktop-misc, x86, java, apache, ppc... --------------enig6701ADF80F40504E260438FD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFEUPHgo/w9rxVVVERAknFAJ9t/8rxCQVd+lTSqT1LWvRfqncPcgCeJBrW +XeDZj+qmPjLcMDPEAb0jNE= =JssP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6701ADF80F40504E260438FD-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list