Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal

[Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>]

Jakub Moc wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:28:10 +0100 Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org>
>> wrote:
>> | On Saturday 09 September 2006 21:25, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
>> | > Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen
>> | > no progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and
>> | > unless someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be
>> | > removed in 30 days.
>> | 
>> | Unless anyone else steps up, I'll take it as I use Drupal for my home
>> | site.
>>
>> Given Drupal's history, is it really worth maintaining it in the tree?
> 
> I don't think so.
> 
> Upstream completely sucks and keeps changing the tarballs silently over
> and over again, so the only solution to the above bug is to remove all
> of the modules/themes/etc. from the ebuild.
> 
> 

So which sucks, upstream or our unbending policy?
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list