From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GKFjU-0003JP-C8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:47:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k84Ek8LM010169; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:46:08 GMT Received: from egr.msu.edu (jeeves.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.127]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k84EgV4q030185 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:42:32 GMT Received: from [35.11.210.66] (warnera6.user.msu.edu [35.11.210.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by egr.msu.edu (8.13.7/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k84EgSMh022322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:42:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44FC3B8C.1090408@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 10:43:24 -0400 From: Alec Warner Organization: Gentoo User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060612) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Bugzilla access for contributors References: <44FB9CC2.4080302@gentoo.org> <200609040305.03880.vapier@gentoo.org> <44FBEFCD.8050504@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44FBEFCD.8050504@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=51C1BC98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e16fe84f-5dce-4fc2-9134-3d25128d8401 X-Archives-Hash: fa1b53899e6508ca81c65295dc67e7bb Josh Saddler wrote: > Stefan Schweizer wrote: >>> they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing >>> problems .. >>> >>> The status is maybe being an arch tester. This GLEP is not about status, >>> only about giving some people bugzilla access when needed. >>> >>> -stefan > > Because as much as possible, we need to see something concrete, not "maybe an > arch tester." We need to have a better definition of what "when needed is" and > who these "some people" are -- think about it. Do we want a system that works > like devship, but only halfway -- like you suggested, just passing the ebuild > quiz -- or is something more needed? These "some people" are people that I deem fit to help on bugzilla for a project for which I am lead (or have the leads approval). "When needed" is when I think I need people for my project. Concrete enough for you? Heck my project has 3 non-developer "contributors" right now[1]. Do they have bugs access yet? I don't think so; but I don't think they will need it either. Then again, afaik all 3 are either AT's or are becoming devs soon ;) [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list