From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GJTb0-0006ch-QM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 11:23:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k82BMB7J018212; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 11:22:11 GMT Received: from mognix.dark-green.com (83-64-96-243.bad-voeslau.xdsl-line.inode.at [83.64.96.243]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k82BINMV007882 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 11:18:23 GMT Received: from [192.168.10.142] (chello084114192194.1.15.vie.surfer.at [84.114.192.194]) by mognix.dark-green.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B639429EA8 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:18:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44F96881.90806@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 13:18:25 +0200 From: Edgar Hucek User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 References: <44F95E3E.9000708@gentoo.org> <44F96559.6010003@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44F96559.6010003@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 831038ed-0e35-4a48-930c-77affa69f808 X-Archives-Hash: 59c262327ea583d4d9e6aa41d35717ad Jakub Moc schrieb: > Edgar Hucek wrote: >> Apeal on extended testing : >> >> Developer, please test things more carefull before you >> release it. >> I already found things which does not compile out of >> the box. >> 1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You >> have to unmask linuxwacom. > > Shrug. Noone even filed a stabilization bug, ask x11-drivers folks why. > There's one now: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145891 > >> 2.) Enable the use flage accessibility gnome cant be >> merged. It fails on compile the speech-tools. >> It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or how >> can it happen that there are already know bugs in the >> stable distro ? >> >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116030 >> >> Festival and the speech-tools are well know not to >> compile with gcc >=4. > > > Well, you know - if you go to read the speech-tools/festival & co. bug, > and read the ebuild, you'll see that the whole thing and code is one > huge mess, that doesn't compile even w/ gcc-3.3 without patching. You'd > probably prefer to never put out a new release, I guess? How many people > are using this one, and how does it justify delaying the release even more? > > >>From my point of view, should it be garanted that a package and depencies compiles when all use flags are enabled. If a depency can't be compiled the use flag and depence should be dissabled/removed from a package. cu Edgar (gimli) Hucek -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list