Re: [gentoo-dev] cdrtools license issues

[Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1071 bytes --]

Chris White wrote:
> On Friday 01 September 2006 12:46, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> WTH is debburn??? Geeez, make the folk respect GPL like everyone else, I
>> don't want any debburn. Besides, we don't distribute any binaries (if we
>> do on release media, we'll have to stop until JS regains a bit of mental
>> sanity).
> 
> What are talking about?  Debburn is the debian fork suggested in the original 
> post.  The whole point of it IS to make it respect the GPL.

Wonderful. Make upstream respect it, instead of forking.

>  Also if you stop 
> and look at the URL, it's an svn repository with the SOURCE for it.  Most 
> people don't svn repository binaries.

You've probably misunderstood me, I was referring to the "oh, we need to
get rid of cdrtools ASAP" call, not to the link you've posted.


-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
 GPG signature:
 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature   ;)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]