From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GJF1N-0004dV-0q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 19:49:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k81JmkkI029271; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:48:46 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k81JkkUb030816 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:46:46 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54D7AA5F64 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:46:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07695-12-4 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:46:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (7.201.broadband6.iol.cz [88.101.201.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E83C535BAF for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:46:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44F88E05.8030806@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 21:46:13 +0200 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cdrtools license issues References: <200609011444.59711.carlo@gentoo.org> <20060901182608.GB9973@kroah.com> <200609011218.40499.chriswhite@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200609011218.40499.chriswhite@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD0D8C284419D2FC3F49C7591" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.314 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=-0.574, BAYES_20=-0.74] X-Spam-Score: -1.314 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 28368802-8e0e-4786-8b0b-0b25e3763d3f X-Archives-Hash: 1cde59af646ff9a64c6eb4a317dc9d59 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD0D8C284419D2FC3F49C7591 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris White wrote: > We have an alternative stated [1]. I think we need to focus more on th= e=20 > problems of using the alternative, then dealing with what some consider= to be=20 > a rather sketchy legal dispute. >=20 > [1] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debburn WTH is debburn??? Geeez, make the folk respect GPL like everyone else, I don't want any debburn. Besides, we don't distribute any binaries (if we do on release media, we'll have to stop until JS regains a bit of mental sanity). --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3= D9E ... still no signature ;) --------------enigD0D8C284419D2FC3F49C7591 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE+I4KhxfV/c66PZ4RA7LnAJ9vw+bKsrsVelliwz2r/kY1sm/JYACfRUyc iEUmxDhADDyVGNrRKTZ7Cds= =36lE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD0D8C284419D2FC3F49C7591-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list