From: Luis Francisco Araujo <araujo@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Xmms needs to die.
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:07:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44F0AA08.5010903@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44F07E21.3020109@gentoo.org>
Alec Warner wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote:
>> On Thursday 24 August 2006 20:46, Alec Warner wrote:
>>> Robert Cernansky wrote:
>>>> What bothers me also, is that it has not plugin design like
>>>> xmms. Support for plugins is very good because lot of people can write
>>>> plugins for lot of things. This is why people do not want to switch
>>>> from xmms because thanks to plugins it have so many features that
>>>> currently no player is able to overcome it.
>>> So port the plugins from xmms to $NEW_CLIENT, since xmms is an old piece
>>> of crap.
>> Who cares. It works (mostly), it is lightweight, and there are enough people
>> using it to keep it in the tree. As long as things don't break beyond repair
>> I see no reason whatsoever to remove xmms (or any other largely unmaintained
>> package in the tree).
>>
>> Paul
>>
>
> This is one of those things (along with qa and security) that the
> community needs to decide. Does stuff that works but has terrible qa
> stay in the tree? Does security stuff stay in the tree, but masked?
> Should xmms be masked? We have no real way of "deprecating" a package,
> aside from leaving it in the tree with a masking reason saying
> "deprecated and unsupported." at which point not everything in the tree
> becomes supported.
>
> The Treecleaner project that I run is based on the assumption that
> broken stuff in the tree is bad, and I try to remove the really old stuf
> broken stuff first. However I aspire to eventually "catch up" and get
> to the currently broken packages. So which way will you have it? Or is
> this more of a pragmatic stance on the tree?
Broken stuff but still maintained upstream, mask it.
Broken stuff and unmaintained upstream , send it to the overlay
(probably with a note warning about it on the ebuild?).
I would opt for that.
So, about the xmms ebuild, i agree with sending it to the overlay.
--
Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org"
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-26 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-23 20:30 [gentoo-dev] Xmms needs to die Luis Medinas
2006-08-23 20:47 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2006-08-24 0:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-08-24 2:49 ` Luis Medinas
2006-08-24 2:58 ` Alec Warner
2006-08-24 3:11 ` Josh Saddler
2006-08-24 3:32 ` Luis Medinas
2006-08-24 0:00 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
2006-08-24 9:44 ` Luis Medinas
2006-08-24 4:33 ` [gentoo-dev] " Luca Barbato
2006-08-24 13:12 ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-08-24 16:23 ` Dominique Michel
2006-08-24 19:37 ` Luca Barbato
2006-08-24 19:48 ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-08-24 19:57 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-08-24 22:41 ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-08-25 14:41 ` bret curtis
2006-08-24 20:07 ` Luca Barbato
2006-08-24 4:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-08-24 6:40 ` Richard Fish
2006-08-24 7:01 ` Jakub Moc
2006-08-24 13:34 ` Anders Hellgren
2006-08-24 12:19 ` Robert Cernansky
2006-08-24 13:16 ` Pierre Guinoiseau
2006-08-24 13:53 ` Robert Cernansky
2006-08-24 14:01 ` Krzysiek Pawlik
2006-08-24 14:22 ` Robert Cernansky
2006-08-24 15:08 ` Andrej Kacian
2006-08-24 16:42 ` Robert Cernansky
2006-08-24 16:55 ` Adriaan Leijnse
2006-08-24 17:34 ` Andrej Kacian
2006-08-25 7:03 ` Robert Cernansky
2006-08-27 17:46 ` Doug Goldstein
2006-08-27 20:51 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-08-27 21:08 ` Doug Goldstein
2006-08-24 18:46 ` Alec Warner
2006-08-25 7:05 ` Robert Cernansky
2006-08-26 15:04 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-08-26 17:00 ` Alec Warner
2006-08-26 20:07 ` Luis Francisco Araujo [this message]
2006-08-26 17:46 ` Josh Saddler
2006-08-26 18:03 ` Luis Medinas
2006-08-27 8:11 ` Robert Cernansky
2006-08-27 8:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-08-27 21:50 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-08-25 9:35 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Birchinger
2006-08-25 17:20 ` Steve Dibb
2006-08-25 18:38 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-08-25 20:49 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alec Warner
2006-08-25 20:59 ` Luis Medinas
2006-08-27 8:04 ` Robert Cernansky
2006-08-24 12:21 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-08-24 10:39 ` Jonathan Adamczewski
2006-08-24 12:31 ` Robert Cernansky
2006-08-24 20:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-08-24 10:46 ` [gentoo-dev] " Luis Medinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44F0AA08.5010903@gentoo.org \
--to=araujo@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox