From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GGfPy-0002zZ-UL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:24:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7PHNdUK006669; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:23:39 GMT Received: from mail54.megamailservers.com (mail54.megamailservers.com [216.251.36.54]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7PHLjkY010017 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:21:45 GMT X-Authenticated-User: sdibb.knightsbrg.com Received: from [192.168.1.241] (64.50.56.200.ptr.us.xo.net [64.50.56.200] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail54.megamailservers.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k7PHLfrN014821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:21:43 -0400 Message-ID: <44EF3174.3@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:20:52 -0600 From: Steve Dibb User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060803) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Xmms needs to die. References: <1156365020.13743.15.camel@darksytem> <44EDA6B9.2020504@gmail.com> <20060825093517.GA24742@netswarm.net> In-Reply-To: <20060825093517.GA24742@netswarm.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ab3b400a-60c2-41b2-b499-56ddf491eb8c X-Archives-Hash: e792b8a4a946334aabf28776c66f9937 So, I'm curious -- did anyone ever come to a decision what to do on the matter? The list traffic seems to be dying down. Maybe I just missed the final decision email. Not that it really matters, but here's my 2 cents: If its a pita to maintain, hard mask everything and just say "sorry, no bugs fixie unless you want to maintain it. See http://dev.g.o/~foo/xmms.html for reasons" At least that way it will still be in the tree for those that want to use it. The second thing is, why does it even matter if its out of the tree or not? Those who are currently using it will still have it installed on their system, anyway. I'm still using audacious 0.2.3 even though it's been taken out, and I won't upgrade until my favorite plugin is ported. I'm fine with that. Anyway, whatever. Do what works best. :) Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list