From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GGUQ2-0004Lh-Lk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:39:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7P5cHjZ023642; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:38:17 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7P5aTk7013711 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:36:29 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB62564255 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44EE8C57.7020301@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:36:23 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet References: <44ECF00D.7050107@gentoo.org> <44EE135A.6010509@gentoo.org> <1156462089.19720.78.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1156462089.19720.78.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9224889EA7D73FC4258F3AAF" X-Archives-Salt: b561a786-66d5-4f88-a647-4d8cc7e42eba X-Archives-Hash: 9b5217b2a9a3369be4402c70c62241ee This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9224889EA7D73FC4258F3AAF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 14:00 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> Oh, gimme a break. Screaming about it on -dev for hundreds of posts=20 >> isn't just equivalent to a vote, it's better. It makes people think=20 >> there's more than 2 developers opposed to it. >=20 > Really? Even you didn't remember that *I* was opposed to Sunrise and > probably accounted for at least a good 50 responses. Yes, good came > from it. Yes, it could have been done much, much better. Sunrise is a poor example for me, because I ignored all the discussion on it past a certain point. It was just rehashing the same points over, and over, and over... > Hopefully, to streamline processes and give power back to individual > projects to govern themselves in internal matters and let people get > back to doing development. That's a goal I would love to see us strive= > to achieve in the next year. =46rom what I see, projects are pretty free to govern themselves. How do you see it differently? As Weeve said, he's still trying to get people to stop breaking SPARC keywords, just like 3 years ago. It's just when trying to do anything larger than a single project that you run into issues. Thanks, Donnie --------------enig9224889EA7D73FC4258F3AAF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE7oxaXVaO67S1rtsRAoUWAJ9gH0dNqrH0T6f7kPqQPIS3zAEq2gCdH3IJ Qf58tVvY9ShlfQ7X9PJgWwE= =QXik -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9224889EA7D73FC4258F3AAF-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list