From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GGLJY-0005hp-MJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:56:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7OJt4OW017974; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:55:04 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7OJqvld030176 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:52:57 GMT Received: from [10.3.1.113] (ip68-102-201-166.ks.ok.cox.net [68.102.201.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8509D644FB for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44EE03B6.2000802@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:53:26 -0500 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet References: <44ECF00D.7050107@gentoo.org> <44EDDE39.6030604@gentoo.org> <44EDE498.70909@gentoo.org> <200608242003.48043.jaervosz@gentoo.org> <44EDEC72.8030207@gentoo.org> <1156447883.6571.32.camel@homer> In-Reply-To: <1156447883.6571.32.camel@homer> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC9EE75141737135C6598AF1B" X-Archives-Salt: 4f1ffa0c-9418-411e-b31a-96743e72712a X-Archives-Hash: 987e852c938983d86d02411c469689e3 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC9EE75141737135C6598AF1B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Homer Parker wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 13:14 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: >> For the record, I was waiting for those folks to come to us to resolve= >> it. Last I knew we had a partial resolution with the parties involved,= >> but shortly after that they just stopped pursing it. I figured if it >> was >> that important to them, they'd get back with us. So I'm not sure what >> happened to that exactly. If they weren't pursing it anymore, I didn't= >> see the point in us pursing it since they were the ones requesting >> it.=20 >=20 > It is important, and still on my todo list. I'm still awaiting the > anon-cvs/svn/whatever to be finished before taking on the next part. No= t > trying to reopen the whole can of worms at them moment, but.. As for > partial resolution, the discussion degenerated to having those saying i= t > would cause classes of devs vs those saying they aren't devs and > shouldn't have @g.o addresses from what I remember. I'll have to go > re-read the thread to be sure. >=20 Yeah, I don't remember where we left off either. I'd have to re-read myself to catch up. I just recall us coming close to a solution. --=20 Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enigC9EE75141737135C6598AF1B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFE7gO4QW+hXSf0t0IRAnoVAKCVxovxeCLRYPgVc8hxKFcL8nHTewCfZJXs Cqg0lsfRPkyxAMk4L5D5nvc= =+6z6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC9EE75141737135C6598AF1B-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list