* [gentoo-dev] new svncache.eclass
@ 2006-08-11 17:42 Mark Stier
2006-08-11 19:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefan Schweizer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Stier @ 2006-08-11 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141806
Provides caching and release tag support for SVN.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: new svncache.eclass
2006-08-11 17:42 [gentoo-dev] new svncache.eclass Mark Stier
@ 2006-08-11 19:05 ` Stefan Schweizer
2006-08-11 20:18 ` Mark Stier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Schweizer @ 2006-08-11 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Mark Stier wrote:
> See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141806
>
> Provides caching and release tag support for SVN.
sorry - I do not see the need for a new eclass here. Can you please instead
modify the subversion eclass and add support for what you want to do?
Best regards,
Stefan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new svncache.eclass
2006-08-11 19:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefan Schweizer
@ 2006-08-11 20:18 ` Mark Stier
2006-08-11 21:24 ` Alec Warner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Stier @ 2006-08-11 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
> sorry - I do not see the need for a new eclass here. Can you please instead
> modify the subversion eclass and add support for what you want to do?
I could if I'd see any reason for that.
Best regards,
Mark
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new svncache.eclass
2006-08-11 20:18 ` Mark Stier
@ 2006-08-11 21:24 ` Alec Warner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alec Warner @ 2006-08-11 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Mark Stier wrote:
>> sorry - I do not see the need for a new eclass here. Can you please
>> instead
>> modify the subversion eclass and add support for what you want to do?
>
>
> I could if I'd see any reason for that.
Going the opposite way, you duplicate much of svn.eclass for one piece
of functionality that could just as easily be included in svn.eclass
Also you copied a bit too much; the eclass attached to the bug has
EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src_unpack
however it never defines it's own unpack func[1].
[1] http://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-11 21:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-11 17:42 [gentoo-dev] new svncache.eclass Mark Stier
2006-08-11 19:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefan Schweizer
2006-08-11 20:18 ` Mark Stier
2006-08-11 21:24 ` Alec Warner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox