From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GBECd-0006Qb-TH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:20:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7AHJM09003964; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:19:22 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7AHH9EV032008 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:17:09 GMT Received: from [192.168.2.158] (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C347B642E0 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44DB6A11.6080605@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:17:05 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mulltiib cruft: /emul References: <200608081143.13375.vapier@gentoo.org> <44DA1FBB.6060307@gentoo.org> <1155228522.6489.97.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> In-Reply-To: <1155228522.6489.97.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig656FCB7C0785561653BE17AC" X-Archives-Salt: 82b39a76-bb36-4dec-b297-c312b83c702d X-Archives-Hash: f0b8aad4c4aff6e556c5d4679106fe4e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig656FCB7C0785561653BE17AC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Olivier Crete wrote: > It was chosen by brad_mssw to match the way it is done on ia64. And I > think we should continue to put the binary > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-* in /emul/ and that lib32 should be > reserved for properly installed packages using portage whenever we > manage to get portage to support it. It makes sense that you wouldn't want these binary packages going into /lib32 or /usr/lib32, but /emul seems like an odd choice compared to something like /opt/lib32. Thanks, Donnie --------------enig656FCB7C0785561653BE17AC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE22oTXVaO67S1rtsRAv0IAKCKQFNu0Upzq4vwdcIPJ1+M5gWBHACgsPQi KAMN68bcjyvZlEU4OPfFmoU= =jy0i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig656FCB7C0785561653BE17AC-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list