From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G9SQY-0005IZ-L4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:07:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k75K6UNm018751; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:06:30 GMT Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k75K4TBB018208 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:04:29 GMT Received: from dagger.cc.vt.edu (IDENT:mirapoint@evil-dagger.cc.vt.edu [10.1.1.11]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k75K4S3q030822 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 16:04:28 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (blacksburg-bsr1-69-170-32-128.chvlva.adelphia.net [69.170.32.128]) by dagger.cc.vt.edu (MOS 3.8.0-FCS) with ESMTP id FZT30666 (AUTH spbecker); Sat, 5 Aug 2006 16:04:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44D4FA89.4070301@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 16:07:37 -0400 From: "Stephen P. Becker" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Make FEATURES=test the default References: <20060805021158.11ca6b15@c1358217.kevquinn.com> <200608051431.46271.vapier@gentoo.org> <44D4E9D9.6080200@gentoo.org> <200608051534.21418.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200608051534.21418.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 21916434-a3e0-4ed7-b054-7bcd11f6c760 X-Archives-Hash: ec01b8c302df47db505db482e5e485cc Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 05 August 2006 14:56, Stephen P. Becker wrote: >> The metadata for sandbox suggests that it is under the control of the >> portage team, even if they lack a herd: > > ... because it is tightly integrated with portage ... there is the aspects of > portage which require some sandbox env setup/etc..., then there is sandbox > itself > > but seriously, you've been around forever, you know this :p Of course I know this, and it sucks. If sandbox is so tightly integrated with portage, then why *isn't* there a portage team member who works on sandbox? -Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list