From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G95K9-0001NZ-Tl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:27:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k74JQLiA020372; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:26:21 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k74JNIia016046 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:23:19 GMT Received: from [192.168.5.10] (dsl081-148-077.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.148.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342D164980 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44D39EA4.9040808@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:23:16 -0500 From: Mike Doty User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060729) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for August References: <20060801093001.C97C864465@smtp.gentoo.org> <44D1BFFD.4040303@gentoo.org> <1154607828.23292.5.camel@localhost> <44D1F4EF.3000209@gentoo.org> <1154612153.17538.26.camel@onyx> <44D30BE8.8060909@gentoo.org> <44D34753.6090604@gentoo.org> <44D36D6E.3060705@gentoo.org> <44D370FD.5010306@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44D370FD.5010306@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ba9afbcb-ed7a-4f56-a023-b1c972c86778 X-Archives-Hash: 6514a6e539c11a3fd09a70f75d809fcd -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alec Warner wrote: > In the new system the massive search query will run on the slave system, > and it won't affect people making changes; hoewever there may be soem > delay between data replication from the master to the slave(s), but that > would be implementation dependent (depends on what you use to replicate). We're using whatever mysql feature is default. From everything I've read the replication is well under a minute at worst. - -- ======================================================= Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead Gentoo Developer Relations Gentoo Recruitment Lead Gentoo Infrastructure GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05 ======================================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBRNOeoYBrouQZ9K4FAQLfzAP+IsgLEraKrzb0lEwVcBEaM/jTOJYsmsRF tlNGSzUXN1LxwNpYr8Q1qrWcb9rIT8+CzMp+upc9xtXy3a7v28a2jGkq6dznx+Bu QvHI7hRF3vM/47fZIlkMuIDoYmJgPKWCzYvwLL/BZeKOGHrnYZGYtFFk62SCesfm dt52GndtEio= =rxS8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list