From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G8dtu-00039F-Og for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:10:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k73E9POn021717; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:09:25 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k73E7X5W030673 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:07:33 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3769D738B59 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:07:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10148-05 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:07:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (7.201.broadband6.iol.cz [88.101.201.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CA0517491 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:07:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44D20317.6030000@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:07:19 +0200 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for August References: <20060801093001.C97C864465@smtp.gentoo.org> <44D1BFFD.4040303@gentoo.org> <1154607828.23292.5.camel@localhost> <44D1F4EF.3000209@gentoo.org> <1154612153.17538.26.camel@onyx> In-Reply-To: <1154612153.17538.26.camel@onyx> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAA642240CE1EDFA0F0C58EA4" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.08 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=-0.895, BAYES_40=-0.185] X-Spam-Score: -1.08 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: bd3d6a86-bc82-4c90-964c-704755072a79 X-Archives-Hash: 361184048f7efdbd5b95d1a09064387c This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAA642240CE1EDFA0F0C58EA4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ned Ludd wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: >>>> Would like the Council to discuss the current state of Gentoo Bugzil= la >>>> [1] and anon CVS/SVN [2]. >>> Please elaborate why you need the council to discuss=20 >>> ongoing active bugs that are in progress. Progress? Erm... see below. >> I would also like to know why the council has to be involved since >> you've never sent an email to infra specifically asking the same thing= >> first. Sure makes sense to me that you should ask the group involved >> with the work first instead of going to the top. Because it's been broken for ages? Because I've asked the same on the bug I've referred to multiple times, as did quite a few other people, and the thing is still dead ~3 hours a day? (So uhm, the argument that infra doesn't know about is _really_ moot.) Because users complain over and over again? Because we are getting tons of duplicate bugs due to bugzilla being non-responsive? Because it's wasting hours of my time every day? Because if CVS was in the same state, you'd about have a revolution by now? >> The anoncvs/svn stuff needs the attention of some knowledgeable cvs/sv= n >> guru. We want to ensure that we cover all our grounds in the setup so >> that we don't make a system that's easily DoS'able. If anyone wants to= >> help out with that, please contact KingTaco as he's the contact for th= at >> project right now. >=20 > It's just about ready afaik. We just want robbat2 to review the CVS=20 > setup and I probably need to drop a patch in the cvs pkg to disable=20 > compression. We probably also want Pylon to review the svn setup. Good news, would be nice if you actually responded on the bug maybe? Or send out some status report occasionally, since the bug's been open for ~1 year now? >> Patience is indeed a virtue. >=20 > Indeed.. Sorry, having a critical facility broken for ~6 months right now =3D! patience. It plain sucks. --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3= D9E ... still no signature ;) --------------enigAA642240CE1EDFA0F0C58EA4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE0gMbhxfV/c66PZ4RA5r1AJ0d5pRAlL8T5Vc8keDQLgUDYiSYdgCcD0Hi iW6P0yID5upQRqXErfl3DaE= =+2h8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAA642240CE1EDFA0F0C58EA4-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list