From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G8VmB-0004VH-Ha for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 05:29:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k735SQWu005847; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 05:28:26 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k735PfMk016701 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 05:25:42 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.106] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D7E6447A for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 05:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44D1882C.1030306@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 22:22:52 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise resumed again (was Resignation) References: <200608020224.25861.carlo@gentoo.org> <20060802013922.GA8912@seldon> <200608022005.16242.carlo@gentoo.org> <20060803025651.GA13458@seldon> <44D16D08.7070808@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44D16D08.7070808@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b502f3a3-8675-4437-8f4b-41beed80df58 X-Archives-Hash: 8a437498464c78015751226b9fbc9fee Lance Albertson wrote: > I think the point a lot of people are concerned about are packages that > contain libraries or other dependencies that reside in the sunrise tree. > There's a good chance that a package in the regular tree will link > against a package from sunrise, the user will have no idea or forget > that they installed that app from sunrise (and the dep exists), and a > bug arises. Who's fault is it? Is it the package maintainer in the > regular tree, or sunrise? How do you stop excessive bug traffic for > issues like this? You create `emerge --info` output that details any packages on the system installed from an overlay. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list