From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G8Tci-0006Cr-TW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 03:11:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k733AaVU006506; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 03:10:36 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7338Hg6024571 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 03:08:18 GMT Received: from [10.3.1.113] (ip68-102-201-166.ks.ok.cox.net [68.102.201.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6027E64669 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 03:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44D168ED.3050806@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 22:09:33 -0500 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise resumed again (was Resignation) References: <200608020224.25861.carlo@gentoo.org> <20060802013922.GA8912@seldon> <200608022005.16242.carlo@gentoo.org> <20060803025651.GA13458@seldon> In-Reply-To: <20060803025651.GA13458@seldon> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig844E300229418106AFF2ED30" X-Archives-Salt: b04ec823-b132-4435-ba19-33ec8fabe944 X-Archives-Hash: 3ea7af891e9459204e4d42cdc932fba1 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig844E300229418106AFF2ED30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brian Harring wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:05:15PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote: >> First I'd like to state that I do offer my opinion. You don't have to = like it,=20 >> but disqualifying it as flaming, while exactly doing this yourself,=20 >> disqualifies you. >=20 > *cough*. bit hypocritical for you to lecture me about viewing=20 > your statements as 'flaming', and in the same breath label=20 > my own as 'flaming' ;) >=20 > Why am I pointing this out? My initial points were that of "why the=20 > double standard", with you providing an apt example (while that's=20 > barbed, you did provide a perfect refresher of the definition). >=20 >=20 >> I'd appreciate, if you would try to have a controversial=20 >> discussion, without starting to loose your manners. >=20 > And I'd appreciate a less condescending tone. Can you two please stop with this child-like circle of blame? Its really starting to get old. You don't need to have the last word on every argument (either of you). If neither of you can agree, then just agree to disagree. *gasp* Yes, that is an option in a technical debate. No matter what either of you two think is technically right, you're both right and both wrong. /me goes back to lurking --=20 Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig844E300229418106AFF2ED30 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFE0WjuQW+hXSf0t0IRAqd1AKC04A3DPtyWXeTHb7Ztdmu0PmpUkQCguX5L aGKCIKwGLY+4ZsLsbMemu6U= =ZA+H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig844E300229418106AFF2ED30-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list