From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G8CzJ-0003MQ-FF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:26:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k729PDaO030116; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:25:13 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k729NMOo002853 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:23:23 GMT Received: from [62.147.153.16] (lns-bzn-48f-62-147-153-16.adsl.proxad.net [62.147.153.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AAA64656 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44D06EA2.8010005@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:21:38 +0200 From: Thierry Carrez Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060704) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise resumed again (was Resignation) References: <20060731035316.74ba21ed@snowdrop.home> <1154322337.11516.34.camel@localhost> <200608020224.25861.carlo@gentoo.org> <20060802013922.GA8912@seldon> In-Reply-To: <20060802013922.GA8912@seldon> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5448c994-5845-4e17-be65-c85ced24065e X-Archives-Hash: 56db0d81713cf54d7933808a9de1f560 Brian Harring wrote: > What the hell do you think the tree is? It's a bunch of arbitrary > packages maintained loosely by subgroups of people; you're stating > that sunrise is too loose yet gentoo-x86 is fundamentally no > different. > > Sunrise is pretty much the same damn thing. Or maybe he means the "Gentoo developers" are an elite group of flawless people, blessed by the mighty ebuild quizz ? That elitism would in the end kill us, and I thank the Sunrise project for opening up Gentoo a little more to the community. We may have to lose a few elitist fellows in the process, but I still stand by the Council decision that it was the right thing to do. I just can't see how an ebuild directly committed without peer review to the tree is necessary better than an ebuild contributed by a power user and peer-reviewed by a Gentoo developer, ending up in a repository you have to choose to use... -- Koon -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list