From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G7KJj-0001ri-GO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:03:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6UN24ET017993; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:02:04 GMT Received: from skylineaero.com (70.43.38.18.nw.nuvox.net [70.43.38.18]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6UMwYwJ023492 for ; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:58:34 GMT Received: from agaffney.org (andrewhome [70.246.193.178]) by skylineaero.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B388106F81 for ; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:56:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (kagome [192.168.0.10]) by agaffney.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80CA1E0244 for ; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:30:50 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <44CD3998.4050107@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:58:32 -0500 From: Andrew Gaffney User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060609) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise resumed References: <44C93C77.6070605@gentoo.org> <200607301754.21947.vapier@gentoo.org> <44CD3718.4050504@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44CD3718.4050504@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ede634f9-124a-4744-8358-ecd3d28066da X-Archives-Hash: 63f9f6068e5ae56ed562acf3a69924bb Stephen P. Becker wrote: > Ok, since the first time around apparently wasn't good enough, how about > this? This project sucks. It takes random ebuilds without enough merit > or demand to even have some team and/or developer within Gentoo pick it > up, and dumps it to a > user-supported-yet-completely-official-break-my-gentoo-style tree that > has to potential to cause all sorts of QA problems. It flies right in > the face of those of us that have strived to educate users not to rice > out their systems with outside-the-tree ebuilds that have not gone > through some sort of arch team and/or maintainer QA before hitting the > tree. There is nothing you or anyone else can say that will make me > think otherwise, and I think it needs to be killed. Now. I try to stay out of these types of things, but I have to say that I agree completely. -- Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list