From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FzzJT-0000iE-FH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:12:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6AHBpNs013640; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:11:51 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6AH8MvT004999 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:08:23 GMT Received: from [192.168.24.6] (ip68-5-234-231.oc.oc.cox.net [68.5.234.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495F2642C8 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44B28970.2020300@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:08:00 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060603) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dying on some CFLAGS instead of filtering them. References: <7c612fc60607091424s467c27e4n665fc3dd4ee2116a@mail.gmail.com> <7573e9640607100134tf62c26awf5784b22fac348d5@mail.gmail.com> <1152526560.22145.5.camel@localhost> <7573e9640607100901p3dcc94ffodcf1f78e42eeb7f2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7573e9640607100901p3dcc94ffodcf1f78e42eeb7f2@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 405f1f40-a1f7-4422-addb-649e24ac378e X-Archives-Hash: e75eee88c6a150e1a1752ef69d4ff4f7 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Fish wrote: > On 7/10/06, Ned Ludd wrote: >> per pkg cflags are here already it would fall under the per >> pkg env variables. > > Please forgive my stupidity, but the only place I could see to set a > env var per package was /etc/portage/bashrc. Is that what you are > referring to? You're close. There is now a per-package bashrc implementation included in $PORTDIR/profiles/base/profile.bashrc. It's kind of silly imo, when the user can simply put that same code in /etc/portage/bashrc, but this is how it is. :) Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEsolv/ejvha5XGaMRAkeoAJ95/lUC/pSZHeo09JOp/PCOx0HkxwCgoBVl zJW3/SnRt48YXixrIFxt+zo= =mg/P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list