From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fyd0s-0000rO-81 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 23:12:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k66N9u6P031212; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:09:56 GMT Received: from smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.96]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k66N6ahO008895 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:06:36 GMT Received: (qmail 19315 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2006 23:06:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.5?) (curtis119@sbcglobal.net@75.13.34.75 with plain) by smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jul 2006 23:06:34 -0000 Message-ID: <44AD9872.7090607@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:10:42 -0400 From: Curtis Napier User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060124) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200607062246.31954@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060706215856.64d8d6c2@snowdrop.home> <200607062312.51721@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060706222339.545302f1@snowdrop.home> <44AD814C.1050508@gentoo.org> <20060706224553.079a9e63@snowdrop.home> <44AD8A12.8000600@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44AD8A12.8000600@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=71FDD46B Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8F9A42A65F9B98F385EAD131" X-Archives-Salt: c2c1097f-ed05-4277-9a21-ce407baa5153 X-Archives-Hash: 8941c885d1c7cc79b3dcf9135991c52c This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8F9A42A65F9B98F385EAD131 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jory A. Pratt wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:31:56 -0700 Joshua Jackson = >>> wrote: >>> | Or instead of throwing a hissy fit yourself about diego not agreein= g >>> | with you..I don't know you could go and show the way that you feel = it >>> | should be done and show the technical merit. Ciaran I will give yo= u >>> | that you are a capable programmer, and had valid arguments in this >>> | thread. However, when interacting with people and proving points on= >>> | merits you seem to go out of your way to not prove anything and thr= ow >>> | examples out there without really backing them up. >>> >>> No, I go out of my way to avoid posting hundred page essays explainin= g >>> things that people already know. If there's really anyone reading thi= s >>> discussion who doesn't understand any of the points being discussed, >>> they're more than welcome to ask for clarification. However, given ho= w >>> basic an issue this is, is it really worth wasting everyone's time wi= th >>> huge explanations of what CFLAGS is? >>> >>> Come on, do you really think anyone will benefit from another >>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~blubb/duncan.pdf ? >>> >=20 > Stephen Bennett wrote: >>> On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:31:56 -0700 >>> Joshua Jackson wrote: >>> >>>> Or instead of throwing a hissy fit yourself about diego not agreeing= >>>> with you..I don't know you could go and show the way that you feel i= t >>>> should be done and show the technical merit. >>> He already has done. >=20 >=20 > After reading this thread I can see this is just another one of ciaran'= s > b.s games that Stephen happens to back. My question is just how far up > ciaran's ass does stephen go. I am begining to think we will never get > to the end if ciaran and his bullshit around gentoo, nor will we ever > get rid of stephen's bullshit around gentoo. But the project continues > to allow such non-sence and wonders why devs are still walking away. >=20 >=20 >=20 I'm not sticking up for Ciaran, he already made his bed and now he's laying in it. I'm sticking up for spb who is a damn good dev and doesn't deserve this kind of bullshit dumped on him. spb works his ass off for this project and is */ALWAYS/* very professional. Just look at the past few threads that he has started where he totally changed his approach based on feedback from everyone (hell, look at ANY technical discussion that spb has ever had regarding Gentoo - not just the last few mail threads). He was professional, listened attentively and made changes based on the feedback that satisfied everyone involved while still solving the problem at hand. Sounds like a damn good developer to me. One I would like to see more of in Gentoo. spb !=3D ciarnm Just my two cents for what it's worth. --------------enig8F9A42A65F9B98F385EAD131 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFErZh18YrbbXH91GsRA5WOAKCJBhmP3BJh6biFhVGavQYRp2AgDgCfcNhQ FseXgezb2uMT8OiHzA917cM= =Igyj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8F9A42A65F9B98F385EAD131-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list