From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FycBU-00047P-1M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:18:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k66MHIMI026703; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 22:17:18 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k66MATmX019138 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 22:10:30 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.102] (tx-76-1-76-132.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [76.1.76.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EB664283 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 22:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44AD8A12.8000600@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:09:22 -0500 From: "Jory A. Pratt" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060620) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200607062246.31954@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060706215856.64d8d6c2@snowdrop.home> <200607062312.51721@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060706222339.545302f1@snowdrop.home> <44AD814C.1050508@gentoo.org> <20060706224553.079a9e63@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060706224553.079a9e63@snowdrop.home> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: fdde90ce-76c4-4ef0-996b-1b4a4d8c90a1 X-Archives-Hash: 55acf212c7143990e0c090ccda9dcb4f -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:31:56 -0700 Joshua Jackson > wrote: > | Or instead of throwing a hissy fit yourself about diego not agreeing > | with you..I don't know you could go and show the way that you feel it > | should be done and show the technical merit. Ciaran I will give you > | that you are a capable programmer, and had valid arguments in this > | thread. However, when interacting with people and proving points on > | merits you seem to go out of your way to not prove anything and throw > | examples out there without really backing them up. > > No, I go out of my way to avoid posting hundred page essays explaining > things that people already know. If there's really anyone reading this > discussion who doesn't understand any of the points being discussed, > they're more than welcome to ask for clarification. However, given how > basic an issue this is, is it really worth wasting everyone's time with > huge explanations of what CFLAGS is? > > Come on, do you really think anyone will benefit from another > http://dev.gentoo.org/~blubb/duncan.pdf ? > Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:31:56 -0700 > Joshua Jackson wrote: > >> Or instead of throwing a hissy fit yourself about diego not agreeing >> with you..I don't know you could go and show the way that you feel it >> should be done and show the technical merit. > > He already has done. After reading this thread I can see this is just another one of ciaran's b.s games that Stephen happens to back. My question is just how far up ciaran's ass does stephen go. I am begining to think we will never get to the end if ciaran and his bullshit around gentoo, nor will we ever get rid of stephen's bullshit around gentoo. But the project continues to allow such non-sence and wonders why devs are still walking away. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFErYoRo9V4dnAHxYwRAiq7AJ4+kLNig3h0Ra8k9CuLJynDFBuC+QCgiq/W BFKmn9FzOXFhWgBt8rSbUdo= =wTC0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list