From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FySb9-0005a7-FB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:04:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k66C2jcx026870; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:02:45 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k66BwFiU028295 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:58:16 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129EE646E4 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44ACFAD3.20000@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 04:58:11 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <44ACF6C9.7010209@gentoo.org> <200607061348.10917@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> In-Reply-To: <200607061348.10917@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC20C49C5B417B5096B99FEB8" X-Archives-Salt: aff6d75c-7e83-45b4-ae12-7cd56aff6f8d X-Archives-Hash: 160243a861fa81ab2313a796324c1a32 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC20C49C5B417B5096B99FEB8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > On Thursday 06 July 2006 13:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> How will you handle non-gcc compilers? > We don't support any, to start with. >=20 > But ICC I'm pretty sure behaves like GCC, and whatever else we'd go by = > supporting should likely do the same. >=20 > But again, we don't support any, so it's up to whoever wants to support= them=20 > to find a solution, I'd say. Well, there are enough in the tree that you should at least make sure they don't completely break and error out when passing them invalid flags, even if you fail to auto-enable mmx/sse/whatever. You could do if [[ $(tc-getCC) !=3D *gcc* ]] or something... Thanks, Donnie --------------enigC20C49C5B417B5096B99FEB8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFErPrVXVaO67S1rtsRAmBkAJ47hoVM9stpqHZWNr5l7dZEIdqBTQCgl7/h gdSnvzyJH4DaSNOxx6z1guA= =VYTA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC20C49C5B417B5096B99FEB8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list