From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FuxXL-00072W-QD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:18:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5QKGf2E013627; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:16:41 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5QKAQ5s015134 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:10:26 GMT Received: from [192.168.2.158] (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5536477B for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44A03F2F.3090408@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:10:23 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list References: <449DFDD1.1090506@gentoo.org> <1151206378.29095.32.camel@localhost> <449E214B.6020401@gentoo.org> <1151349060.11622.63.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1151349060.11622.63.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0357289B7B445DB792DCE101" X-Archives-Salt: e9cad664-5cb0-4d86-b22a-30a71862c7d4 X-Archives-Hash: e1ddccd06ab4ba1347ac1b1bd69a07c0 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0357289B7B445DB792DCE101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Gianelloni wrote: > - Create a new list ("gentoo-core-announce" ?) > Reading: dev-only > Posting: dev-only, reply-to set to gentoo-core > This is the reference list of things (policy, decisions and discussions= > in progress) all developers must know about. Agree with -(core|dev)-announce. > - Keep -core and -dev, as non-required reading Agree, but with the caveat that devs must still be at least subscribed to -core even if they choose not to read it. This way, you could have a -dev-announce that also refers to something private on -core if need be. > Now, do we really need it to be -core-announce? Not really. In fact, > at one point we'd come up with both a -core-announce and a > -dev-announce, with -core-announce being for more sensitive information= =2E I'm having a tough time thinking of sensitive information that all devs must know about (i.e., that would qualify for -core-announce). Thanks, Donnie --------------enig0357289B7B445DB792DCE101 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEoD8wXVaO67S1rtsRAp+0AJ9H4OPkAqkYlkgBp8zKJrWrsZ7jTgCfUT0s mpJxEl5xdMUrjb9JYzySkTw= =1AiX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0357289B7B445DB792DCE101-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list