From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-14267-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1Fu6HG-000784-EC
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:26:14 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5OBOWmd010444;
	Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:24:32 GMT
Received: from buggy.blubb.ch (cable-static-87-245-102-53.shinternet.ch [87.245.102.53])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5OBLHWi005126
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:21:17 GMT
Received: from aqua ([192.168.10.5])
	by buggy.blubb.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1Fu65k-0003Mn-Nc
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 13:14:20 +0200
Message-ID: <449D202D.1050801@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 13:21:17 +0200
From: Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060605)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla usage by gentoo-java's doing migration
 work
References: <449B305B.20909@gentoo.org>	 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606230848430.27216@1-2-12-5a.gfa.gbg.bostream.se>	 <449BAB07.6080906@gentoo.org> <449BD583.6090808@gentoo.org>	 <1151065109.3778.5.camel@procyon.operationaldynamics.com>	 <1151067038.5360.36.camel@localhost> <449BEE3C.2020301@gentoo.org>	 <449BF1C2.70501@gentoo.org>	 <1151072899.18759.88.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>	 <1151115910.8047.16.camel@procyon.operationaldynamics.com> <7cf8dd660606232107wdd503ebyad343e4c410a603c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7cf8dd660606232107wdd503ebyad343e4c410a603c@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 023a7e63-f390-4563-ba2a-3652049915ab
X-Archives-Hash: 570f430e10c8a4fab9b563c34fa89c34

James Potts wrote:
> There is a problem here for the java folks...Technically, their
> migration-overlay is an overlay, and technically, that overlay is
> currently unofficial.  Therefore, technically, if it is against the
> rules for projects and/or devs to use bugzilla for unofficial
> overlays, then it is against the rules for the java team to use
> bugzilla for their migration-overlay.
> 
> As for the fact that the migration overlay is in the process of being
> moved to o.g.o, "in the process of" doesn't mean it's already been
> done, and until it's finished, the above statement stands.
> 
> Props *and* apologies to the java team for this, but it looks like you
> need to move the overlay *before* you finish the migration process
> now.

Question is, do we care about blindly following a policy that obviously was
targetting at something completely different, or do we care about getting stuff
done?

There's nothing as unproductive as political correctness.

Just my 0.02 SFr,

-- 
Kind Regards,

Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list