From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-14243-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1Ftoac-0000Ny-Ra for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:33:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5NGSIcX018926; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:28:18 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5NGEsIf018928 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:14:55 GMT Received: from [192.168.5.10] (dsl092-247-066.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.247.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D17A644E4 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <449C137A.2070809@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:14:50 -0500 From: Mike Doty <kingtaco@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060603) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] sunrise, a temporary compromise References: <449B305B.20909@gentoo.org> <449B72CD.5050903@gentoo.org> <b38c6f4c0606222312g22070976v25457a97e03e5713@mail.gmail.com> <449BE870.80506@gentoo.org> <449BF8ED.9020608@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <449BF8ED.9020608@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 27ea2568-6bae-4193-b6ca-65fe39703403 X-Archives-Hash: dfee410dde5c9f236d1f3c9617861e1e Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Mike Doty wrote: >> It is devrels place to attempt to stop the fighting. This is what I >> did. I clearly indicate that this is temporary and when the council is >> willing to clear this nonsense up, it will supersede anything I put >> forth yesterday. > > I agree that it is devrel's place to help people find a compromise. I > disagree that it is devrel's place to set general technical policy based > on this compromise by saying "All non-Gentoo hosted overlays are subject > to this" when the compromise does not involve all the relevant people. > > Thanks, > Donnie > What you're missing here is that I did not make a technical decision. I implemented the councils recommendations in such a manner as to not piss off either side too much. If you're familiar with US leagalize, you should view this as a temporary injunction. I implore you and other interested developers to address the remaining points through constructive discussion and then ask the council to make a final decision. Here are a list of points that I feel need more discussion: 1. Different types of overlays: gentoo.org vs. non-gentoo.org and developer focused vs. user focused. 2. Appropriate use of bugzilla for overlays of all varieties. 3. Appropriate use of www.gentoo.org/proj for overlays. -- ======================================================= Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead Gentoo Developer Relations Gentoo Recruitment Lead Gentoo Infrastructure GPG: 0094 7F06 913E 78D6 F1BB 06BA D0AD D125 A797 C7A7 ======================================================= -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list