From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fsma5-00068f-Bm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:12:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5KKA7kj003536; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:10:07 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5KK60G7005571 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:06:01 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.106] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DD264839 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44985525.9040208@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:05:57 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060604) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4? References: <41626.192.168.2.21.1150830698.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> In-Reply-To: <41626.192.168.2.21.1150830698.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6623A648A18A408F978EF582" X-Archives-Salt: ce790707-9048-4a64-b88f-2098055386f6 X-Archives-Hash: 231290ce470855bf4d581cdb9dafd1d5 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6623A648A18A408F978EF582 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Caleb Tennis wrote: >> Currently we are at 4), should we change anything? >=20 > My proposal: >=20 > I would personally like to stay with just the "qt" use flag. The use f= lag > will be for support of whichever version of Qt is supported (v3 or v4) = for > the particular emerge. >=20 > In the cases where more than one version is supported, it should be for= > Qt4 only. The Qt3 version should be a separate emerge. For example, i= n > the case of the poppler bindings, there should be a poppler-bindings-qt= 3 > package. >=20 > It's not pretty, but I think it's the best tradeoff we have. My counterproposal: The newest version of any package should always have the unversioned flag. Versioned flags should be for a conscious choice to use a less current package. I disagree with separate packages, if it's possible to build both at once. That's the point of USE flags. Thanks, Donnie --------------enig6623A648A18A408F978EF582 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEmFUmXVaO67S1rtsRAirQAJ0U6q/HfA0LbUqjbV/GvOTLPUMdjwCeK94r bmbWMUvYGQQ1OlkRbV06FoY= =XSy8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6623A648A18A408F978EF582-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list