From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FpdCe-0006dF-Ui for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:35:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5C3XTPq030407; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:33:29 GMT Received: from egr.msu.edu (jeeves.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.127]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5C3VJpU029382 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:31:19 GMT Received: from [69.176.143.70] (69-176-143-70.dov.spartan-net.net [69.176.143.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by egr.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5C3VHLW012286 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 23:31:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <448CE00B.7030706@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 23:31:23 -0400 From: Alec Warner Organization: Gentoo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060528) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] July Council Meeting: Requested Agenda Item References: <1149906516.4234.91.camel@gaspode> <20060610072731.GA16323@superlupo.rechner> <1149941616.9414.32.camel@gaspode> <20060611230831.GH10668@osgiliath> <448CDC7E.1040200@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <448CDC7E.1040200@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a184f68e-3bdc-4615-8086-369542ea357a X-Archives-Hash: 309ae27d47cd665ac6ab33ebc40b138a Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > >>On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:13:36PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: >> >>>To take an example, there were made up quotes in my GWN interview, >>>however, nothing of great harm. I believe that time it was a case of >>>attempting to make it more fun, it is however a worrying trend. >> >>One of my blog entries was also over-interpreted and included in the >>GWN without consulting me first, causing a mail storm in my inbox from >>angry users of xsupplicant: > > > If errors in the GWN result in large numbers of emails directly to you > rather than to the GWN, maybe the developer's email link shouldn't be > included in articles and feedback should instead be linked to gwn-feedback. > > The GWN is a fairly independent publication, so I think it should be > free to make its own mistakes as long as it retains journalistic > integrity. But perhaps it could benefit from some sort of advisory board > of Gentoo developers/staff? Er the GWN is currently a Gentoo Project. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/pr/gwn.xml Although apparently the project page needs updating ;) > > Thanks, > Donnie > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list