From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fpd2b-0000wS-L1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:24:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5C3Mued026550; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:22:56 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5C3JT2L005938 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:19:30 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.115] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DB764721 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <448CDC7E.1040200@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:16:14 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060609) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] July Council Meeting: Requested Agenda Item References: <1149906516.4234.91.camel@gaspode> <20060610072731.GA16323@superlupo.rechner> <1149941616.9414.32.camel@gaspode> <20060611230831.GH10668@osgiliath> In-Reply-To: <20060611230831.GH10668@osgiliath> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3834BA42069F55B6630C5C08" X-Archives-Salt: 852efed4-94db-4f70-aa9d-035e09605631 X-Archives-Hash: 2662484fd6d451763db022bb52ba4c20 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3834BA42069F55B6630C5C08 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:13:36PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: >> To take an example, there were made up quotes in my GWN interview, >> however, nothing of great harm. I believe that time it was a case of >> attempting to make it more fun, it is however a worrying trend. >=20 > One of my blog entries was also over-interpreted and included in the > GWN without consulting me first, causing a mail storm in my inbox from > angry users of xsupplicant: If errors in the GWN result in large numbers of emails directly to you rather than to the GWN, maybe the developer's email link shouldn't be included in articles and feedback should instead be linked to gwn-feedbac= k. The GWN is a fairly independent publication, so I think it should be free to make its own mistakes as long as it retains journalistic integrity. But perhaps it could benefit from some sort of advisory board of Gentoo developers/staff? Thanks, Donnie --------------enig3834BA42069F55B6630C5C08 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEjNx+XVaO67S1rtsRAnwyAKDciy6/NTw5wjQo4xcDb6jWo+4AKQCg+y8W jnre7FR3hqkaWFVJaTHHc8M= =hY8A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3834BA42069F55B6630C5C08-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list