From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fonmd-0006bN-Df for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:40:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k59KcKTH000937; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:38:20 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k59Ka3g5022426 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:36:03 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.115] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254F7645E0 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4489DAF9.3030400@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:32:57 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060609) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification References: <44887368.9030302@gentoo.org> <1149803837.19443.101.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <4488A4F3.5060908@gentoo.org> <1149811589.19102.23.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> <1149841698.9743.20.camel@localhost> <1149870017.22473.22.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <1149874871.9743.77.camel@localhost> <1149884042.22473.150.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1149884042.22473.150.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3BE6D610A1C1A0932510E2EE" X-Archives-Salt: 1a2569b9-45c2-4da4-832e-1668acbf4e5c X-Archives-Hash: 15fb39d83d67409399cc701a4ec42bb3 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3BE6D610A1C1A0932510E2EE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Gianelloni wrote: > Since when was overlays.gentoo.org supposed to even be a service to our= > users? As I understand it, the goal was to ease development, not to > provide an easy method for half-working ebuilds to make it to our user'= s > machines. Our users are our biggest base of testers, and the point of overlays is to develop and test, so of course one of the goals is to get overlays onto users' (testers') machines. Making testing as easy as possible is important. But it should be clear that it is testing, and if the apps were ready for the real Portage tree, they'd be in it. Thanks, Donnie --------------enig3BE6D610A1C1A0932510E2EE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEidr5XVaO67S1rtsRAkXEAJ41HhtXl2V5kJ1HikTfXyGAdjtfyACgy7Ct U9v9pbIZXrZJvtama2szzzU= =ydBN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3BE6D610A1C1A0932510E2EE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list