From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fomay-0000X2-3F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:24:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k59JLxJ4025073; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 19:21:59 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k59JGS6s019242 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 19:16:28 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.115] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAB464598 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 19:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4489C852.3000300@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:13:22 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060609) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] client+server packages - build which one? References: <200606091410.51183.uberlord@gentoo.org> <200606091743.40901.uberlord@gentoo.org> <1149879857.22473.82.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1149879857.22473.82.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6FA0B8A6E9F86A9327695841" X-Archives-Salt: 8684e426-c4d3-4c2a-832b-0fd33696fd29 X-Archives-Hash: a75adf4f67f546028f4d837922bdd4e8 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6FA0B8A6E9F86A9327695841 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Gianelloni wrote: > Not policy (I don't think) but current accepted practice. >=20 > Should this become a policy? I'd say so, since this discussion regularly comes up again, and how we do it is really an expression of the Gentoo philosophy and our differences from a typical binary distribution. Thanks, Donnie --------------enig6FA0B8A6E9F86A9327695841 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEichSXVaO67S1rtsRAiNmAJ0QKwJWa11rxSSdkb/hyoDsphPiTgCgoJjc Tk7AfxTu8u7el9PS9aIqIww= =4ZVv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6FA0B8A6E9F86A9327695841-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list