From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] client+server packages - build which one?
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:58:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4489C4DD.6020108@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1149878957.22473.73.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 712 bytes --]
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> The truth is that we don't ever want to become like the binary
> distributions. We don't want to have to have separate
> client/server/common/devel as it removes many of the advantages that
> Gentoo has. The default should *always* be to install the package as it
> was intended from upstream, completely intact. Now, it has started to
> become a practice to have a "minimal" USE flag on certain packages that
> reduces the functionality to the bare client portion. I see no real
> problem with this, so long as the default is to always build/install the
> full package.
I suppose we should get the "server" flag on cvs changed to "minimal," then.
Thanks,
Donnie
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-09 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-09 13:10 [gentoo-dev] client+server packages - build which one? Roy Marples
2006-06-09 13:55 ` George Shapovalov
2006-06-09 13:57 ` Alec Warner
2006-06-09 14:31 ` Patrick McLean
2006-06-09 17:15 ` Luca Barbato
2006-06-09 16:43 ` Roy Marples
2006-06-09 19:04 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-06-09 19:13 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-06-09 19:27 ` Roy Marples
2006-06-09 20:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-06-09 21:14 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-06-09 18:49 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-06-09 18:58 ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2006-06-09 18:52 ` Kevin F. Quinn
[not found] ` <20060808085657.GA15665@nibiru.local>
2006-08-08 10:11 ` Roy Marples
2006-08-08 10:24 ` Brian Harring
2006-08-08 10:55 ` Enrico Weigelt
2006-08-08 11:10 ` Brian Harring
2006-08-08 14:46 ` Enrico Weigelt
2006-08-08 15:06 ` Thomas Cort
2006-08-08 17:46 ` Joshua Nichols
2006-08-08 11:48 ` Simon Stelling
2006-08-08 18:50 ` Colin Kingsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4489C4DD.6020108@gentoo.org \
--to=spyderous@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox