From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FolXN-0003Ap-SG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:16:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k59IFlbM013756; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:15:47 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k59ICk9I003076 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:12:46 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0048C5368A8 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:12:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17501-07 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:12:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (7.201.broadband6.iol.cz [88.101.201.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A8A506F4D for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:12:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4489BA11.5010702@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:12:33 +0200 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification References: <44894E7C.5070302@gentoo.org> <1149872786.22473.38.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <200606091955.17280.peper@aster.pl> In-Reply-To: <200606091955.17280.peper@aster.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7CC83B4535BA7D3398198942" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.343 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=0.256, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.343 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 2c0aed8c-2037-4a35-bb0f-bb7257526a7d X-Archives-Hash: 39d86bf7774670ec9f67e7d8239f659f This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7CC83B4535BA7D3398198942 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Peper wrote: >>> well. A couple of examples: >>> >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D122500 >> And again, you use my project of an example. Perhaps you should try >> looking at something that actually supports your argument? >=20 > I think it's an example of how user-friendly is bugzilla... Yeah, exactly... I don't understand where did this idea of me using someone else's own project against himself came from in the first place. *confused* I've merely posted a few examples illustrating that bugzilla and attachments suck big time for new ebuilds' development. Or, why did you switch vmware-server work to SVN if bugzilla is *the* place for all this? Apparently it's not all that great, otherwise you wouldn't have done that. --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3= D9E ... still no signature ;) --------------enig7CC83B4535BA7D3398198942 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEiboVhxfV/c66PZ4RA8uRAKCHqhfkUrxSPUZF5/egNhAWG3+VSQCfVTU1 NC/q1tuGekup3JyU6Qj805Q= =w0Cs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7CC83B4535BA7D3398198942-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list