From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Foi53-00022L-JM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:35:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k59EYPob017771; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:34:25 GMT Received: from mail.cs.mcgill.ca (mail.CS.McGill.CA [132.206.51.234]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k59EVH7F023566 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:31:17 GMT Received: from potus.CS.McGill.CA (tls.CS.McGill.CA [132.206.3.97]) by mail.cs.mcgill.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813982FCA0 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:31:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [132.206.2.111] (thor.CS.McGill.CA [132.206.2.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by potus.CS.McGill.CA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C44A1B0081 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:31:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44898633.8010404@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:31:15 -0400 From: Patrick McLean User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060605) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] client+server packages - build which one? References: <200606091410.51183.uberlord@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200606091410.51183.uberlord@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4e609fb5-f9ae-420d-ba2b-7fc08a601fdc X-Archives-Hash: 1181d2c56edbf10cc3ea0dd0a6370f34 Roy Marples wrote: > USE client server > client - just build the client - duh > server - just build the server - duh > client and server OR neither then build both. > > Other packages to possably beneift > udhcp > mldonkey > samhain > bacula > boxbackup > finger, telnet and ssh are probably other candidates. (though not too many people set up boxes without a ssh server these days). ++ to this, I have always found it a little absurd having dhcpd installed on my laptop just for dhclient. George Shapovalov wrote: > Of course this multiplies the number of packages to support, if such situation > is common. However the solution you describe can be considered "clean" only > after #2272 is finally resolved.. > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272 I doubt whether any devs would argue against USE based dependencies. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list