From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FoT2u-0004mR-R7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:32:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k58MUB7g018638; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:30:11 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k58MMlP0000187 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:22:47 GMT Received: from [192.168.2.158] (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097A3653D9 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4488A332.7010703@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:22:42 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060513) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification References: <44887368.9030302@gentoo.org> <20060608192004.GC6526@osgiliath> <4488813A.901@gentoo.org> <1149804133.19443.107.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1149804133.19443.107.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEBA382483B6C0C3FE583AF8B" X-Archives-Salt: 9488c1d0-361a-4a6a-b318-443bd0c7d9f4 X-Archives-Hash: 817068608a351d6d9c57be0a0c255f50 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEBA382483B6C0C3FE583AF8B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Gianelloni wrote: > No, but the ebuilds are also checked by the team in question, that > actually knows the packages, versus a couple of developers that will be= > overworked, dealing with packages that they are completely unfamiliar > with and have no experience with. I just don't see the two as equal in= > any way. I also do not see how this helps Gentoo development. Being able to maintain these ebuilds in version control rather than random attachments to bugzilla is a huge improvement. Thanks, Donnie --------------enigEBA382483B6C0C3FE583AF8B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEiKM0XVaO67S1rtsRAq0MAKCYb5ZBRTw6U1IYg0bOrG6CcQmEbACgg9Vk G8Vov96o5CNf6rMF4rRxSeo= =Fbxi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEBA382483B6C0C3FE583AF8B-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list