From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FkJtE-0005Fa-Fq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 11:57:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4SBu16F014116; Sun, 28 May 2006 11:56:01 GMT Received: from alpha.total-knowledge.com (alpha.total-knowledge.com [205.217.158.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4SBroSo016519 for ; Sun, 28 May 2006 11:53:51 GMT Received: (qmail 13430 invoked from network); 28 May 2006 04:53:49 -0700 Received: from bzq-88-155-239-188.red.bezeqint.net (HELO ?192.168.2.179?) (ilya@88.155.239.188) by alpha.total-knowledge.com with ESMTPA; 28 May 2006 04:53:49 -0700 Message-ID: <44791EE7.4080608@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 20:54:15 -0700 From: "Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" Organization: Total Knowledge User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060420) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <200605162150.34009@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <448F2081.5040202@gentoo.org> <200605162300.00110@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060516224749.3212fab6@localhost> <1147873370.16876.5.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20060517150830.30a6160d@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060517150830.30a6160d@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 68219d4d-0bc1-46b2-b902-bb80fffcee78 X-Archives-Hash: cda75cbc32149a1b5f82527d1e313483 Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Wed, 17 May 2006 09:42:50 -0400 > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > >> I would say it wouldn't hurt to start a project for ensuring Paludis >> support in the Portage tree. It would give a bit more credibility to >> your cause. >> > > The problem that I see with this is that it would tend to reinforce the > view that Paludis is becoming an officially supported package manager, > which at the moment at least it isn't. If people are amenable to the > idea though, I'm quite willing to set it up. > And I am willing to be part of it. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list