From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FiXkW-00010O-A3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 May 2006 14:20:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4NEJW0t002625; Tue, 23 May 2006 14:19:32 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4NED2mn021417 for ; Tue, 23 May 2006 14:13:03 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB496445A for ; Tue, 23 May 2006 14:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31828-04 for ; Tue, 23 May 2006 14:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE701643A9 for ; Tue, 23 May 2006 14:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44731865.8010109@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 07:12:53 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060513) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving virtual/eject to new-style virtual References: <200605231238.56089@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060523112539.GA5873@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20060523112539.GA5873@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3CB7C943761397040704C4AE" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.239 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.154, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.946, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046] X-Spam-Score: 0.239 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 835a29a0-ba89-492b-b412-951d14eade36 X-Archives-Hash: 013460b53dcc170b1cce666ef80049b0 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3CB7C943761397040704C4AE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Harald van D=C4=B3k wrote: > How does it help? New-style virtuals have several disadvantages, and th= e > usual advantages of new-style virtuals don't apply here. If it actually= > provides real benefits, then no objections from me, but how is this > easier to maintain than a "virtual/eject sys-block/unieject" entry in > the default-bsd profile? Could you expand on the disadvantages? Thanks, Donnie --------------enig3CB7C943761397040704C4AE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEcxhlXVaO67S1rtsRAkcEAKC71PqwAxg1r5jxubYIwfgAP6hWBACfXVfD xPzkK/0FgILYunSLo25Hkpk= =CR/b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3CB7C943761397040704C4AE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list