From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgJjO-0003IA-OL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:58:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HAvBUX006960; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:57:11 GMT Received: from buggy.blubb.ch (cable-static-87-245-102-53.shinternet.ch [87.245.102.53]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HAqd9A028678 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:52:39 GMT Received: from chief ([192.168.10.2]) by buggy.blubb.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FgJZE-0001Py-9C for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 12:47:48 +0200 Message-ID: <446B0076.5060302@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:52:38 +0200 From: Simon Stelling User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060516) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <20060517014253.15e92d29@localhost> <200605171214.38540.pauldv@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200605171214.38540.pauldv@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5718b742-b49c-408c-a5f6-f07266552546 X-Archives-Hash: 2a62def0ec7d5e2b6e6a5327badbf62e Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Wednesday 17 May 2006 02:42, Stephen Bennett wrote: > >>paludis/packages: >>-*>=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51.22 >>*sys-apps/paludis > > > Is there any reason that portage and paludis can not live together. As > this basically blocks any kind of migration or backwards compatibility I > see this as a very serious roadblock to the acceptance of paludis as a > supported (secondary) package manager. This is not a block. -*>=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51.22 means that the depedency on portage is no longer in the system class (base defines it as such). -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list