[gentoo-dev] LINGUAS support

[gentoo-dev] LINGUAS support

[Tuan Van]

The other day spyderous was looking for a tool to remove extra .po
that he doesn't need. I recommended him to set LINGUAS in make.conf.
  Then I realized some package doesn't respect that variable (ie eject)
Would it be better (easier) to have portage removes those extra
locales in $D/usr/share/locale/ before merge than patch the source?
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] LINGUAS support

[Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 478 bytes --]

On Monday 15 May 2006 21:09, Tuan Van wrote:
> The other day spyderous was looking for a tool to remove extra .po
> that he doesn't need. I recommended him to set LINGUAS in make.conf.

in bashrc:

if [[ ${EBUILD_PHASE} == "postinst" ]]; then
        einfo "Running localepurge..."
        PATH="/bin:/usr/bin" localepurge
fi

-- 
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: LINGUAS support

[Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-]

localepurge works fine.  No need for portage to do it.

Michael Sterrett
   -Mr. Bones.-
mr_bones_@gentoo.org

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Tuan Van wrote:

> The other day spyderous was looking for a tool to remove extra .po
> that he doesn't need. I recommended him to set LINGUAS in make.conf.
>  Then I realized some package doesn't respect that variable (ie eject)
> Would it be better (easier) to have portage removes those extra
> locales in $D/usr/share/locale/ before merge than patch the source?
>
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] LINGUAS support

[Harald van Dijk]

On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:09:09PM -0700, Tuan Van wrote:
> The other day spyderous was looking for a tool to remove extra .po
> that he doesn't need. I recommended him to set LINGUAS in make.conf.
>   Then I realized some package doesn't respect that variable (ie eject)
> Would it be better (easier) to have portage removes those extra
> locales in $D/usr/share/locale/ before merge than patch the source?

Part of bug #9988, the response was that it didn't belong in portage.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list