From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FaDiG-0006S2-Cz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:19:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k3UFIWLt012179; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:18:32 GMT Received: from egr.msu.edu (jeeves.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.127]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3UFEprx025029 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:14:52 GMT Received: from [69.176.143.70] (69-176-143-70.dov.spartan-net.net [69.176.143.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by egr.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3UFEplh001459 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:14:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4454D4D8.406@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:16:40 -0400 From: Alec Warner Organization: Gentoo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060405) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union References: <20060428171453.GB62035@watcher.kimaker.com> <20060428185501.GA22506@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <20060428192434.GB22373@woodpecker.gentoo.org> <44527A01.3080506@gentoo.org> <20060430012640.GB7596@ubik> <4454A9BE.50700@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4454A9BE.50700@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4172f046-b791-4699-8974-b867e2b4c0c2 X-Archives-Hash: 0a928c3a5c14aac04971d4c885f582f1 Luca Barbato wrote: > Alexandre Buisse wrote: > > >>[1] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/tools-discuss/2006-April/000366.html >>[2] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/bzr-eval/ >>[3] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/dcm_evaluation_mercurial/ >>[4] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/git-eval.txt >> > > > > Those figures are slightly old, some of the issues are probably > addressed both on mercurial and git. > > I'd say that both are nice and are probably a good solution. > > if there is space and cpu I'd like to have someone playing with them and > send benchmark results. > I am currently working on this, I have a page under proj/en/infrastructure where I am describing my efforts but I need a bit more time to make it pretty ;) Currently cvs2svn is almost done, and git cvsimport is chugging along. Not really a fan of bzr for us but we use it for pkgcore, so I'll fire that up as well. I haven't looked at mercurial but it is on the list ;) -Alec Warner > Mercurial should use a bit less disk and git should be a little faster > and with better merge/conflict resolution features. > > lu > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list