From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FaAoq-0005FP-Di for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:14:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k3UCDuLE004066; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:13:56 GMT Received: from smtp2.libero.it (smtp2.libero.it [193.70.192.52]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3UCBlo9026524 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:11:47 GMT Received: from localhost (172.16.1.202) by smtp2.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 4451642F0029F6F1 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:11:47 +0200 Received: from smtp2.libero.it ([172.16.1.225]) by localhost (asav16.libero.it [193.70.193.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00304-01 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:11:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (adsl-ull-254-49.44-151.net24.it [151.44.49.254]) by smtp2.libero.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C09A8C12 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:11:45 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <4454A9BE.50700@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:12:46 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060426) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union References: <20060428171453.GB62035@watcher.kimaker.com> <20060428185501.GA22506@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <20060428192434.GB22373@woodpecker.gentoo.org> <44527A01.3080506@gentoo.org> <20060430012640.GB7596@ubik> In-Reply-To: <20060430012640.GB7596@ubik> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned: with antispam and antivirus automated system at libero.it X-Archives-Salt: e42fd316-5804-4894-8ad0-a40e6450ab49 X-Archives-Hash: 1b40ca0d9421ff492477c00cac28b00a Alexandre Buisse wrote: > > [1] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/tools-discuss/2006-April/000366.html > [2] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/bzr-eval/ > [3] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/dcm_evaluation_mercurial/ > [4] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/git-eval.txt > Those figures are slightly old, some of the issues are probably addressed both on mercurial and git. I'd say that both are nice and are probably a good solution. if there is space and cpu I'd like to have someone playing with them and send benchmark results. Mercurial should use a bit less disk and git should be a little faster and with better merge/conflict resolution features. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list