From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FZXxH-00036R-85 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:44:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k3SIi4La012382; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:44:04 GMT Received: from mail.ineton.ro (mail.ineton.ro [217.156.27.7]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3SIg1Pc032089 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:42:02 GMT Received: (qmail 8289 invoked by uid 210); 28 Apr 2006 21:42:01 +0300 Received: from 217.156.27.36 by hera (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (bitdefender: v7.0/2490/372431. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(217.156.27.36):. Processed in 1.277819 secs); 28 Apr 2006 18:42:01 -0000 Received: from tg-neamt1.ineton.ro (HELO ?217.156.27.36?) (mrness@217.156.27.36) by mail.ineton.ro with ESMTPA; 28 Apr 2006 21:42:00 +0300 Message-ID: <445261EE.2000408@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:41:50 +0300 From: Alin Nastac Organization: Gentoo Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060218) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union References: <20060428171453.GB62035@watcher.kimaker.com> <20060428175248.GA28444@cerberus.oppresses.us> <20060428182205.GA62866@watcher.kimaker.com> In-Reply-To: <20060428182205.GA62866@watcher.kimaker.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7D616E556A202E5036854187" X-Archives-Salt: 51e137ed-e882-49fd-a6b0-55017c3e1fb1 X-Archives-Hash: 1c2c933b0a6e03c85f6ba7aff039ce78 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7D616E556A202E5036854187 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ryan Phillips wrote: > >The council should not vote on gleps are provide policy. They should >be there to handle the money and world-wide problems. > >The developers should drive innovation; not the council. > >As in all democracies things get done slowly. We don't need a >democracy within Gentoo, just a clear way of creating progress. > > > Just because we have some elections in our process don't make Gentoo a democracy. Since we don't have a leader to make the important decisions, we need some other form of authority to do the job. A council is the best solution to the decisional problem. Obviously it has nothing to do with innovation. As always, this is the realm of developers. In the rest, I basically agree with avenj. No point in repeating what Jon already said... --------------enig7D616E556A202E5036854187 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEUmHyRZBYwhawvi4RAg33AJ0V/E0NlbxMEIzAoASkOSryNeJl3QCeJ6t4 +3XcesNwR42jUtXRBrr0rVU= =6n14 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7D616E556A202E5036854187-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list