From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FVrgR-0005qa-KG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:00:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k3IExbtT009245; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:59:37 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3IEuEIn003147 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:56:14 GMT Received: from www.eigenor.com ([194.252.160.195] helo=mail.eigenor.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FVrck-0006GQ-86 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:56:14 +0000 Received: from [172.17.16.102] (fork.eigenor.com [194.252.160.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eigenor.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5232437D for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:36:29 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4444FE09.7000503@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:56:09 +0300 From: Philippe Trottier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-util/cccc References: <20060415044904.GD18636@aerie.halcy0n.com> <623652d50604180611h424db1e1tca69de0409c8be2a@mail.gmail.com> <1145368303.18478.27.camel@rivendell> <200604181022.28459.vapier@gentoo.org> <1145371286.18478.42.camel@rivendell> In-Reply-To: <1145371286.18478.42.camel@rivendell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f418d2ce-5353-477f-b13e-7ac7bfec688f X-Archives-Hash: 1ae2b4e960d1b6eed03af5590af2e5e4 foser wrote: > On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>either you have a policy of cutting unmaintained packages or you dont ... you >>cant have some vague middle ground > > > Hide behind policy if you can't do it with common sense. The policy is > to add valid metadata.xml data to packages that do not have it, that has > not been done here. Adding 'maintainer-needed' (or 'no-herd') as a way > out is not sufficient and was never intended policy when metadata/herds > got introduced. > > - foser If no one has an objection, I'll pick up that package, I think it is fun, never tought I'd use it, but I have so much code written I'd like how much I have really done. If there is no objection I'll make the update needed, create metadata, make repoman happy. Phil -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list