From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FVWXc-0001b3-NF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:25:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k3HGPBWS023447; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:25:11 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3HGNFnE003643 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:23:15 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FVWVO-000087-VN for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:23:15 +0000 Message-ID: <4443C024.1030405@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:19:48 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060407) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-server 1.0.99/1.1 ABI break References: <44432517.7050903@gentoo.org> <444366A0.6080501@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <444366A0.6080501@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC00DF163B8BE61C5EFD03E59" X-Archives-Salt: d8e7ed36-0891-43bd-b495-fd4df58ccfdf X-Archives-Hash: 3fc9d562018b35a94582e9f00b65fda0 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC00DF163B8BE61C5EFD03E59 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Simon Stelling wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> We are working to ensure the dependencies work as smoothly as possible= , >> but I expect there will be some issues since it's difficult to require= >> updates to all these optional drivers following an update to the serve= r. >=20 > wouldn't !< atoms solve that problem? The drivers cannot be upgraded until a newer server is installed. So technically, this would allow things to work by forcing people to unmerge all their drivers before upgrading, then remerge the new versions. That's not a very desirable solution either, but do you think it's the best one? Thanks, Donnie --------------enigC00DF163B8BE61C5EFD03E59 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEQ8AmXVaO67S1rtsRAn5VAJ9c7/wYN8Or5yah5VbI7A8EGBWGEQCg+ykJ MFxU/TavTqP+04GrmLtZqmE= =iOR6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC00DF163B8BE61C5EFD03E59-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list