From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FRnjv-00065o-W2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 09:58:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k379wjh5000660; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 09:58:45 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k379usIJ015966 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 09:56:54 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A43F5395CB for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31729-03-2 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (7.201.broadband6.iol.cz [88.101.201.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6B453548A for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44363756.6040706@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 11:56:38 +0200 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Improving Gentoo User Relations References: <1144377010.5485.82.camel@gaspode> <9445dc2b0604070151t68e184fdo3601938bb52d0871@mail.gmail.com> <443631D3.9060308@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <443631D3.9060308@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig415678FFE3B7D27FA00EB7CE" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.287 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=-0.547, BAYES_20=-0.74] X-Spam-Score: -1.287 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 4a5591f8-1c11-4611-9f9b-714dc0074d9a X-Archives-Hash: 231358fdead0c90d12b2156c2562ae5e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig415678FFE3B7D27FA00EB7CE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Christopher O'Neill wrote: >> . I notice certain other popular distros are now running GCC4 (and >> have been for some time), yet we are still running 3.4.6 (on ~x86). I >> know it's a lot of work ensuring that all packages compile properly >> with GCC4 and that there are no introduced bugs, but I have no idea >> how we are progressing on this - and wouldn't even like to ask for >> fear of asking in the wrong place.. >=20 > Toolchain updates in particular take longer than with most distros, > because of the nature of ours -- we need every user to be able to > compile every keyworded package from source, and we have an extremely > large package database. >=20 > I bet there's a bug open for it. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D117482 >=20 >> . How's portage 2.1 getting along? I notice it gets frequent updates. >=20 > The gentoo-portage-dev list is the place to follow this. Also, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115839 --=20 jakub --------------enig415678FFE3B7D27FA00EB7CE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFENjdbhxfV/c66PZ4RA8bFAKCemqJl75+q+aNz1rFiatj2DO3hLACfdyTS zT1HOU+9H6sz2ymZQsDN39s= =K8XX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig415678FFE3B7D27FA00EB7CE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list