* [gentoo-dev] 2.6.16 and packages in conflict @ 2006-03-20 16:55 Daniel Drake 2006-04-03 14:04 ` Daniel Drake 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Daniel Drake @ 2006-03-20 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Hi, Linux 2.6.16 will be in the tree very soon. Assuming there aren't any major problems, we'll hopefully be marking it stable in 2-3 weeks. As usual, please bring any conflicts (e.g. compilation failures of kernel module ebuilds against 2.6.16) to our attention by making them block bug 126972. Thanks! Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.16 and packages in conflict 2006-03-20 16:55 [gentoo-dev] 2.6.16 and packages in conflict Daniel Drake @ 2006-04-03 14:04 ` Daniel Drake 2006-04-03 16:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Daniel Drake @ 2006-04-03 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > Linux 2.6.16 will be in the tree very soon. Assuming there aren't any > major problems, we'll hopefully be marking it stable in 2-3 weeks. We're planning to mark it stable on 10th April. Maybe a few days later, need to double check that we don't have any in-kernel 2.6.16 showstoppers. Please ensure your packages are fixed in the stable tree. Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: 2.6.16 and packages in conflict 2006-04-03 14:04 ` Daniel Drake @ 2006-04-03 16:59 ` Duncan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Duncan @ 2006-04-03 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Daniel Drake posted <44312B63.1090009@gentoo.org>, excerpted below, on Mon, 03 Apr 2006 15:04:19 +0100: >> Linux 2.6.16 will be in the tree very soon. Assuming there aren't any >> major problems, we'll hopefully be marking it stable in 2-3 weeks. > > We're planning to mark it stable on 10th April. Maybe a few days later, > need to double check that we don't have any in-kernel 2.6.16 showstoppers. This isn't a show-stopper, but it's possible you'll get others running into the issue that understand as little as I did about it... Maybe this will save folks the hair tearing frustration I went thru tracing it. AMD64 > 4G memory: SCSI formerly (2.6.15 and earlier) used bounce-buffers. It now relies on the IOMMU, either the hardware GART IOMMU for true AMD64, or a software emulation thereof for Intel's EM64T. It'll need to be configured into the kernel and working. Also, here, I had a BIOS issue. AGP Hypertransport Fast-writes had to be disabled in ordered for the IOMMU (and DRI/DRM) to function. Because the kernel froze every time I tried IOMMU, I had the kernel configured without it, so I had /two/ changes to trace down and make, before it would work, thus the problem, since either one alone wasn't enough. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-03 17:02 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-03-20 16:55 [gentoo-dev] 2.6.16 and packages in conflict Daniel Drake 2006-04-03 14:04 ` Daniel Drake 2006-04-03 16:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox