public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Strandman <simon.strandman@telia.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: toolchain.eclass and gcc 4.1 snapshots
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:09:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4427B9C6.80609@telia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4427A862.8030004@telia.com>

Simon Strandman skrev:
> R Hill skrev:
>> Simon Strandman wrote:
>>> It seems like toolchain.eclass does something wrong when configuring 
>>> gcc 4.1 snapshots. I decided to try gcc 4.1 on my server so I 
>>> created a gcc-4.1.1.20060324 ebuild and defined the SNAPSHOT 
>>> variable in it (current cvs has a lot of bugfixes since the 
>>> release). This is the way I've done it with gcc 4.0 and I never had 
>>> any problems then. The ebuild emerges without problems but it 
>>> installs files in both /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1-20060324 
>>> and /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1. So when I try to emerge 
>>> anything it always fails with errors like this:
>>>
>>> configure:2239: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -march=pentium3 -pipe 
>>> -fomit-frame-pointer -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1   conftest.c  >&5
>>> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: 
>>> cannot find -lgcc_s
>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>>
>>> Just copying over the files from one dir to the other and then 
>>> symlinking it works around the problems. Any ideas?
>>
>> This is caused by changes to the build system in 4.1 and GCC's 
>> BASE-VER not matching portage's ${PV} in snapshot builds.  Most of 
>> the system directories are set up by portage during configure using 
>> ${PV} as part of the dirname. (eg. 
>> includedir=/usr/<lib>/gcc/<chost>/${PV}/include).  However, libdir 
>> and libexecdir aren't set by portage (because they generate really 
>> strange paths w/ --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs in GCC 
>> 3.3/3.4) and default to /usr/<lib>/gcc/<chost>/BASE-VER/blah.  When 
>> ${PV} != BASE-VER, wackiness ensues.
>>
>> Try this in your ebuild:
>>
>> src_unpack() {
>>     toolchain_src_unpack
>>
>>     echo ${PV/_/-} > "${S}"/gcc/BASE-VER
>>     echo "" > "${S}"/gcc/DATESTAMP
>> }
>>
>> --de.
>>
> Thanks for the help! But now it fails with this error:
>
> <built-in>:1: internal compiler error: in define__GNUC__, at 
> c-cppbuiltin.c:296
> Please submit a full bug report,
>
>
> This has been reported in gcc bug #19372 and apperantly it has 
> something to do with the version string. :(
I opened a bug about it:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127724
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



      reply	other threads:[~2006-03-27 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-25 13:12 [gentoo-dev] toolchain.eclass and gcc 4.1 snapshots Simon Strandman
2006-03-26  3:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2006-03-27  8:54   ` Simon Strandman
2006-03-27 10:09     ` Simon Strandman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4427B9C6.80609@telia.com \
    --to=simon.strandman@telia.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox