From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FLQ9d-0004gC-Kz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:35:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2KJXUWi003980; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:33:30 GMT Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2KJTpEf004243 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:29:51 GMT Received: from aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060320192951.EVDA29040.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:29:51 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.102] (really [82.17.179.110]) by aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060320192951.TRRO28606.aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.1.102]> for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:29:51 +0000 Message-ID: <441F04E1.8000100@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:39:13 +0000 From: Daniel Drake User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060207) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package naming References: <200603201742.24784.uberlord@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200603201742.24784.uberlord@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 92ffbeea-a141-41a7-9155-202dbef72874 X-Archives-Hash: d9b15851570f2cf7989a3a60afb1b3c9 Roy Marples wrote: > Now, if the commandline is the same, should the package name be the same? If > so, what version number should I be using? It's currently just called > resolvconf-0.1 Definately change the name of the package (if not the script itself) otherwise the Debian resolvconf author wouldn't be too happy. resolvconf-gentoo would be a good choice Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list