From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FLQFM-00016m-7q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:40:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2KJd21S006328; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:39:02 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2KJZHJH026005 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:35:17 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FLQ9s-00005o-Sq for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:35:17 +0000 Message-ID: <441F0286.10502@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:29:10 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060208) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package naming References: <200603201742.24784.uberlord@gentoo.org> <441F04E1.8000100@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <441F04E1.8000100@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig938BEE1318FF3CE1A122F6B3" X-Archives-Salt: 7c5646c8-a2d1-4330-90c4-13de35393797 X-Archives-Hash: a5125dec1f0c0be6ef6979bf3fa42de1 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig938BEE1318FF3CE1A122F6B3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Daniel Drake wrote: > Roy Marples wrote: >> Now, if the commandline is the same, should the package name be the >> same? If so, what version number should I be using? It's currently >> just called resolvconf-0.1 >=20 > Definately change the name of the package (if not the script itself) > otherwise the Debian resolvconf author wouldn't be too happy. Or you could do something completely crazy like ask if the author's interested in incorporating your rewrite. Donnie --------------enig938BEE1318FF3CE1A122F6B3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEHwKGXVaO67S1rtsRAoClAJ9raxHbofUW4oME5j9eZgRknFboCgCg5WM0 nP8ZfX8Lc0NCScG/7vqhcrE= =sr1L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig938BEE1318FF3CE1A122F6B3-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list